I started this over Memorial day and finished it over Fourth of July. The final result was an escapement built out of Knex that harnessed the power of a 3 pound weight dropping 22 inches to drive a pendulum for 20 minutes. The initial build went quite quickly with a working model being built in about an hour. That first version only ran for about 4 minutes. Over the course of the first weekend I made several observations and improvements to get the running time up to 8 minutes. The easiest update to make was to increase the length of the pendulum. However, the original design included some weight at the end of the pendulum to lower the center of mass. A longer, lighter pendulum proved much more effective. The other major change that I made was to add a pulley to the weight, effectively doubling its running time. The problem this introduced was that the twine I was using would double up on itself on the winding rod and the outer windings were used up much faster.
After a few weeks of considering this, I made an adjustment that removed the central support for the winding rod. This gave me the full length of the rod to wind the string. This increased it’s running time to 12 minutes. However, the mechanism became far more picky. The reason for this was that as the point that suspended the weight moved (as the rope would unwind) the rod would flex. When that point was right in the middle, the rod would flex down causing the end with the ratchet gear to flex up and the escapement would skip. It took some time, but I was able to eventually fix this by doubling up the ratchet gear, making it weigh more and more likely to hit the escapement accurately.
The second to last improvement was to add a double pulley, again doubling it’s running time, except for the fact that the windings once again would double over. This gave me a run time of 15 minutes. The final improvement was to switch the string from a heavy twine over to fishing line. This meant that the string would not double over itself. Also, because the fishing line was so thin, I got more windings out of the same length.
The pendulum was of great interest. As noted, I could easily adjust the mechanism by changing the length of the pendulum. Over the course of the project it changed many times. The length seen in the pictures is not the longest version, but the longest version weighed too much for the double pulley and would jamb, so it was shortened. This followed the general trend; longer pendulums resulted in the mechanism running longer while shorter pendulums were more reliable. However, if a pendulum became much too short it would also jam by swinging all the way in one direction and locking the escapement.
Another piece of interesting note, I could tell where the center of mass of the pendulum was by watching the weight. As the weight descends, there is a small amount of lateral movement, normally this is so small that it cannot be noticed. However, when the weight is at the same height as the center of mass of the pendulum, these slight lateral movements become harmonic and the weight would begin to rock noticeably, After it descended past the center of mass, the rocking would increase.
Link to Pictures
Link to Movie
Update: After posting the original article I made a few updates. The first major update was to increase the pulley system from a double pulley to a triple pulley, doubling its run time. Before making this change I reduced the weight by half to make sure it would still run, however after making the change I found that the way the weight had shifted along with more moving parts (and more friction) it no longer ran. I had to increase some structural support because parts were shifting causing the main shaft to pinch. After that was worked out it ran a little, but would often die out. This was because the weight was so reduced that the friction of some of the pieces rubbing together was more than the weight could over come. To fix this, I put a piece at the end to position the main shaft. This piece met head-to-head with a very small profile which significantly reduced the friction.
I also changed the shape of the escapement. The left side prior to the change was position in such a way that when it was struck by the ratchet, it did not contribute to the pendulums swing. This was a major hit to my efficiency. I created a new structure that would contribute to the swing. This required a minor addition because the new half of the escapement was throwing the center of mass off. I added a counter weight to the opposite side and all is well. Below is a link to the updated movie. The pictures in the gallery have been updated as well.
Updated Escapement Movie
Update #2: The improvements I made to the escapement with my last update had to draw-backs. The first was that I still didn’t feel like I had an escapement that was particularly efficient. Every time the left prong was struck, it would flex and in doing so, lose energy. The second problem was that the new escapement performed better, and smoother and so the mechanism ran three minutes faster. I want it to run slower. So I started working on a redesign and came up with something I liked and fitted it onto the structure. It runs more efficiently, but also a bit longer (32 minutes running time).
Updated #2 Escapement Movie
Update #3: I did a major rebuild. More than doubled the height, nearly trippled the distance that the weights drop. I bought a bunch of gears online and incorporated those into the clock. You can see that the escapement is the same from the last update. In the video, around 0:30 you can see the gear train from the escapment through 2 stages of reduction to the weight. This design runs for around 3 hours.
Update #3 Escapement Movie